This two-day event was organized in collaboration with the Standing Conference of Towns and Municipalities, Serbia as part of the World Bank-Austria Urban Partnership Program (UPP) aimed to assist and support cities and local governments in South East Europe (SEE) in a process of modernization and reform, in order to promote local development for inclusive and sustainable growth, and enhanced urban governance. The Program is targeted at South-East Europe, including Albania, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Croatia, Kosovo, Macedonia, Montenegro and Serbia.
The dialogue in Belgrade focused on findings from Municipal Finance Self-Assessment and Urban Audit: Sharing good practices and lessons learned.
In the first phase of the Program, seven City to City (C2C) Dialogues were held on the following topics: (i) Improving Municipal Revenues (Budapest, December 2011); (ii) Modernizing Local Public Expenditure Management (Mavrovo, May 2012); (iii) Modernizing Legal and Regulatory Framework in SEE (Tirana, June 2012); (iv) Guided Urban Land Development - Reconciling Public and Private Interests (Budva, November 2012); (v) Mayors Symposium: Towards Transparency and Accountability (Vienna, January 2013); (vi) From Local government Self-Assessment to Implementation (Dubrovnik, June 2013) and (vii) From MFSA to City Investment Programming = Urban Audit (Skopje, December 2013).
Participants included around 120 representatives from seven Western Balkan countries from central and local government, including municipal staff from financial and technical departments, city planners, representatives of central government ministries, national associations of local governments, and civil society organizations.
Ivan Bosnjak, State Secretary at the Serbian Ministry of Public Administration and Local Self Government provided opening remarks. Setting the tone for the dialogue Mr. Bosnjak stressed the need for capacity building of local authorities, as well as the need for professional exchange within the Region. He emphasized the importance of cooperation between national and local governments, since the reforms that are planned on national level are often causing challenges for local governments.
As a part of the Dialogue several panel and roundtable discussions showcased success stories from the Region:
City of Belgrade, Serbia: MFSA played an instrumental role in getting the City’s investment grade credit rating. It helped the City standardize data to Moody’s methods. Slobodan Milosavljević, Finance Secretary, City of Belgrade, said, “Moody’s ratings experts accepted MFSA as a tool. This tool helped us standardize data to Moody’s methods.”
City of Rijeka, Croatia: MFSA helped (i) identify problems with financial planning; (ii) develop the City Strategy; (iii) get a clear picture of whether the City can afford to assume their part of the participation in EU projects - it helped prioritize financially sustainable projects.
Municipality of Gjirokastra, Albania: MFSA was useful (i) in the context of territorial consolidation; (ii) instrument for bringing together the past, present and future financial situation; (iii) it encourages collaboration between different departments of the municipality, and (iv) can be used to communicate with central government, external partners such as Banks, as well as international donor community.
An urban planner from Berat, Albania reported that the Urban Audit process helps his municipality effectively balance three things: needs, wishes, and opportunities. It identifies gaps in infrastructure and service provision, then engages with the MFSA data to generate a mid-term budgeting plan.
Roundtable with representatives from Ministry of Finance and Local Government Associations discussed central-local government collaboration as well as specific country initiatives. Representatives showed enthusiasm about the MFSA and the results achieved in their countries. The Ministry representative from Montenegro expressed high interest to see MFSA applied in all municipalities in Montenegro.
At the end of the Day 2 the study tour was organized and conducted by colleague from Urban Planning Institute in Belgrade. The tour aimed to show the differences that exist in urban development patterns in the city of Belgrade such a s historic vs modern, formal vs informal, public vs private; capital investments financed from different funding sources; private real estate initiatives on large and small scale, as well as challenges of accommodating missing infrastructure in informally built areas. The tour ended at Sava promenade, recently opened public space which is going to be a part of Belgrade Waterfront development area.
UPP will continue with the C2C Dialogues as they proved to be successful way of gathering the Region around the table and discuss achievements as well as current issues. Main focus of the C2C is on problem solving through peer-to-peer knowledge exchange by bringing together different stakeholders to share workable strategies designed to foster local partnerships and more efficient, self-sufficient, and transparent governance.
Materials, Day 1:
Belgrade strategy 2016 WBA
Revised MFSA - Benefits and Challenges
Marina Trajkovska Kisela Voda MFSA
Municipality of Vlora Jeton Puka
NALAS' and LGA's Stake in Scaling Up of MFSA
Slobodan Milosavljevic Belgrade Creditworthiness on MFSA
Snjezana Sikiric - MFSA implementation in City of Crikvenica
MFSA - Revised Reports in Serbia
Municipality of Gjirokaster Lazaj Aurora
Rijeka MFSA GRI Beograd
Municipality of Strumica MFSA and UA
Materials, Day 2:
Municipality of Berat My Urban Audit Experience - E.Nino
Municipality of Kisela Voda - M. Trajcovska
SLAP Expiriences and options - N. Curic
Municipality of Kriva Palanka UA
Central - Local Government Cooperation and Coordination -MoF Macedonia
Association of Albanian Municipalities - MUNICIPAL FINANCE, URBAN PLANNING AND LAND MANAGEMENT
Program budgeting experience at local level in Republic of Serbia